Thinking

Practical thinking for
foundation portfolios.

Clear guidance on shared communications capacity, reporting, evidence, websites, and funder-sponsored cohort programmes.

Articles

Practical questions
funders need to answer.

Written for programme, communications, strategy, learning, and grantmaking operations teams.

These articles focus on decisions funders can make to reduce duplicated effort and strengthen communications and reporting capacity across a portfolio.

01 Portfolio Practice

What funders should not ask every grantee to solve alone

A practical guide to identifying communications, website, evidence, and reporting needs that are better addressed through one shared programme.

02 Shared Standards

When a portfolio needs shared communications standards

How to introduce a useful baseline across different organisations without flattening their voice, context, or ownership.

03 Reporting

A practical way to improve reporting without creating another burden

How evidence inventories, story-capture tools, model narratives, and existing-tool dashboards can make reporting more useful without adding another system.

The first three pieces are in development. Each will be grounded in practical funder and grantee responsibilities.

Editorial Standard

Plain language.
Useful decisions.

We will publish practical guidance, not a glossary of proprietary terms. Every piece should help a funder understand a portfolio problem, choose an intervention, or set clearer responsibilities.

Portfolio communications Shared standards Evidence and reporting Digital platforms Cohort programmes Ongoing support
Review the Offers
Apply the Thinking

Start with
the Diagnostic.

The diagnostic turns a portfolio-wide capacity question into shared standards and a practical twelve-month roadmap.